IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Bourbonnais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 53 17 22 39 0.736 0.4686 0.4752 2.2050 2.2361
2012-13 — USHL 63 25 24 49 0.778 0.4953 0.4759 2.3308 2.2396
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 RPI D1 — SR 36 17 14 31 0.861
2015-16 RPI D1 — JR 35 15 11 26 0.743
2014-15 RPI D1 — SO 41 5 8 13 0.317
2013-14 RPI D1 — FR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · RPI
-72.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3057
Forward overall
#133
Forward born in 1993
#439
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Mayer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.