IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Girard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Le Sommet Faucons USPHL-Elite 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0502 0.0538 0.0655 0.0701
2025-26 Hawkesbury Knights USPHL-Premier 39 2 7 9 0.231 0.0761 0.0806 0.0785 0.0832
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 SUNY Cortland D3 — SR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2004-05 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2003-04 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 16 2 0 2 0.125
2002-03 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 12 1 1 2 0.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21065
Defenseman overall
#1109
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Fretz
Fitchburg State · 2012-13
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Sorabella
Wesleyan · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Gorrie
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.