IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lukas Buchta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-12-05 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0310 0.0318 0.1580 0.1623
2013-14 Berani Zlin U20 USHL-Style-Czech 36 10 18 28 0.778 0.2402 0.2330 0.8307 0.8057
2014-15 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 59 8 12 20 0.339 0.2000 0.1862 1.0182 0.9482
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 27 1 2 3 0.111
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 34 1 8 9 0.265
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 24 0 1 1 0.042
2015-16 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 32 0 4 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2015-16 · Nebraska Omaha
-35.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8126
Defenseman overall
#1209
Defenseman born in 1994
#2928
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hall
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.