IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elijah Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cincinnati Jr. Cyclones USPHL-Premier 34 0 2 2 0.059 0.0194 0.0203 0.0200 0.0209
2025-26 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 26 0 7 7 0.269 0.0473 0.0456 0.0617 0.0594
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 1 4 0.148
2024-25 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 1 4 0.148
2023-24 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 1 4 0.148
2022-23 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 1 4 0.148
2021-22 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 1 4 0.148
2020-21 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 1 4 0.148

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28635
Defenseman overall
#4221
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Gavin
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Breidenbach
Concordia · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Brown
Bethel · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.