IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Parrott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Soo Eagles NOJHL 28 3 13 16 0.571 0.0954 0.0996 0.2379 0.2484
2016-17 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 47 1 6 7 0.149 0.0547 0.0551 0.1572 0.1584
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 17 0 1 1 0.059 0.0216 0.0207 0.0621 0.0595
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24029
Defenseman overall
#2928
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Robertson
Norwich · 2014-15
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Conner Couet
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Kapetanovic
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.