IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Couet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — NAHL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0612 0.0612 0.1760 0.1760
2020-21 — NAHL 41 1 5 6 0.146 0.0538 0.0538 0.1544 0.1544
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 57 2 9 11 0.193 0.0709 0.0685 0.2037 0.1968
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 24 3 10 13 0.542
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 22 1 5 6 0.273
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 13 1 3 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+375.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22398
Defenseman overall
#3244
Defenseman born in 2001
#6173
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Piehler
Bethel · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Eustace
Wentworth · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Morrissey
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.