IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Morrissey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 24 5 3 8 0.333 0.0715 0.0694 0.1632 0.1585
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 32 11 15 26 0.812
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 24 6 4 10 0.417
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 13 3 8 11 0.846
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 17 4 6 10 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2016-17 · Franklin Pierce
+890.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#45727
Forward overall
#1985
Forward born in 1995
#1718
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Shuter
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aiden Moser
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinton Hill
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2021-22
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.