IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Moser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 34 2 20 22 0.647 0.1831 0.1831 0.4077 0.4078
2023-24 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 57 11 31 42 0.737 0.2084 0.1975 0.4643 0.4400
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 27 2 8 10 0.370
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 14 0 3 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+18.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5613
Defenseman overall
#1040
Defenseman born in 2003
#729
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyllian Kirkwood
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.