← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Shuter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0403 0.0403 0.3764 0.3764
2020-21 Express Hockey Club EHL 37 1 12 13 0.351 0.0754 0.0754 0.1721 0.1721
2021-22 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 8 16 24 0.522 0.1120 0.1104 0.2555 0.2517
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC SO 24 1 8 9 0.375
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC FR 23 4 3 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Arcadia
+222.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38885
Forward overall
#1743
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.