← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinton Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 49 3 8 11 0.225 0.0575 0.0575 0.1692 0.1692
2020-21 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 11 8 10 18 1.636 0.2733 0.2733 0.6812 0.6812
2021-22 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 54 17 35 52 0.963 0.1854 0.1758 0.6073 0.5758
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 22 2 5 7 0.318
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 18 0 2 2 0.111
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+10.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20476
Forward overall
#987
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.