← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinton Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 49 3 8 11 0.225 0.0649 0.0649 0.1690 0.1690
2020-21 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 11 8 10 18 1.636 0.2759 0.2759 0.6799 0.6799
2021-22 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 54 17 35 52 0.963 0.2724 0.2583 0.6068 0.5753
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 22 2 5 7 0.318
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 18 0 2 2 0.111
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-24.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17064
Forward overall
#574
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.