IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-10-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.2829 0.3125 0.6301 0.6961
2012-13 Estevan Bruins SJHL 39 0 3 3 0.077 0.0222 0.0236 0.0579 0.0614
2013-14 Estevan Bruins SJHL 56 5 16 21 0.375 0.1083 0.1092 0.2823 0.2847
2014-15 — MJHL 33 3 4 7 0.212 0.0600 0.0571 0.1336 0.1272
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 30 4 6 10 0.333
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 22 1 1 2 0.091
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 9 0 3 3 0.333
2015-16 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2015-16 · Norwich
+280.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15944
Defenseman overall
#1874
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Ahearn
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Ebner
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Coyne
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.