← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Gavin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHLP 41 2 21 23 0.561 0.1059 0.1021 0.1263 0.1217
2017-18 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 35 1 13 14 0.400 0.1318 0.1259 0.1361 0.1300
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC GR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Worcester State D1 SO 8 0 3 3 0.375
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 8 0 3 3 0.375
2018-19 Worcester State D1 FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · Worcester State
-4.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13966
Defenseman overall
#2072
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.