IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Sciabarra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 48 1 13 14 0.292 0.0674 0.0687 0.2359 0.2405
2023-24 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 42 9 13 22 0.524 0.0766 0.0753 0.2568 0.2525
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 26 2 12 14 0.538
2024-25 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 25 1 4 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2024-25 · Johnson & Wales
+191.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8338
Defenseman overall
#1917
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Redmon
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Fylling
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.