← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Foley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-07 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 New Jersey Renegades USPHL-Premier 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0171 0.0170 0.0443 0.0440
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 3 1 0 1 0.333
2024-25 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 3 1 0 1 0.333
2023-24 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 3 1 0 1 0.333
2022-23 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 3 1 0 1 0.333
2021-22 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 3 1 0 1 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#59207
Forward overall
#4101
Forward born in 2006
#6904
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2016-17
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2023-24
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.