← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-20 Country: Canada
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Erie Otters OHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Erie Otters OHL 44 2 5 7 0.159 0.0920 0.0974 0.4088 0.4329
2023-24 Erie Otters OHL 38 22 12 34 0.895 0.5176 0.5233 2.2989 2.3243
2024-25 Erie Otters OHL 66 20 36 56 0.849 0.4909 0.4710 2.1802 2.0917
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 67 40 47 87 1.298 0.7512 0.6829 3.3365 3.0332
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3821
Forward overall
#75
Forward born in 2005
#171
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2024-25
1.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
AJHL 2016-17
0.29
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NCDC 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
QMJHL 2023-24
0.88
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.