← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Therrien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-08 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Alvernia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 North Bay Battalion OHL 54 7 6 13 0.241 0.1392 0.1513 0.6185 0.6721
2023-24 North Bay Battalion OHL 61 20 18 38 0.623 0.3604 0.3744 1.6008 1.6629
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 55 17 21 38 0.691 0.3997 0.3946 1.7753 1.7526
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 5 2 2 4 0.800 0.4628 0.4336 2.0556 1.9259
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13656
Forward overall
#529
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alvernia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.82
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
0.88
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
0.54
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
0.67
actual FR PPG at Alvernia

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.