← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Del Vecchio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Caledon Admirals OJHL 4 0 3 3 0.750 0.1838 0.1963 0.5164 0.5514
2018-19 Caledon Admirals OJHL 48 8 13 21 0.438 0.1072 0.1092 0.3012 0.3069
2019-20 Caledon Admirals OJHL 52 25 49 74 1.423 0.3488 0.3488 0.9798 0.9798
2020-21 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC 18 2 10 12 0.667
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 22 5 7 12 0.545
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 18 3 4 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2021-22 · Norwich
+215.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15640
Forward overall
#681
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.