← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaden Pitre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-08 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 6, Pick #181  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 OHL 63 7 4 11 0.175 0.1010 0.1098 0.4486 0.4875
2023-24 Flint Firebirds OHL 35 10 20 30 0.857 0.4958 0.5150 2.2023 2.2877
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 57 22 31 53 0.930 0.5379 0.5310 2.3891 2.3585
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 49 18 26 44 0.898 0.5195 0.4867 2.3074 2.1618
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5328
Forward overall
#112
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State
WHL 2023-24
0.36
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2023-24
0.82
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2023-24
0.17
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.