← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vann Williamson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-14 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 15 1 3 4 0.267 0.1543 0.1710 0.6853 0.7593
2023-24 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 38 3 7 10 0.263 0.1523 0.1615 0.6763 0.7170
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 68 2 25 27 0.397 0.2297 0.2317 1.0203 1.0290
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 68 3 34 37 0.544 0.3148 0.3017 1.3981 1.3397
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4511
Defenseman overall
#949
Defenseman born in 2006
#838
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHL 2017-18
0.29
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.19
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHL 2023-24
0.48
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2011-12
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.