IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Mahoney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 10 1 4 5 0.500 0.2039 0.2010 0.4019 0.3961
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 33 11 15 26 0.788
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 33 11 15 26 0.788
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 33 11 15 26 0.788
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 33 11 15 26 0.788
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 33 11 15 26 0.788
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 33 11 15 26 0.788

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15588
Forward overall
#764
Forward born in 2003
#506
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Christensen
Saint Anselm · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Allen
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.