← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Manzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Albany Academy NE-Prep 22 10 8 18 0.818 0.1578 0.1578 0.3744 0.3744
2022-23 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 32 7 10 17 0.531 0.0777 0.0843 0.2604 0.2827
2023-24 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 42 8 11 19 0.452 0.0662 0.0685 0.2218 0.2296
2024-25 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 41 12 22 34 0.829 0.1213 0.1193 0.4066 0.3999
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 29 5 12 17 0.586
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 29 5 12 17 0.586
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 29 5 12 17 0.586
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 29 5 12 17 0.586
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 29 5 12 17 0.586
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 29 5 12 17 0.586

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24330
Forward overall
#1351
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wesleyan · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.