IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Tano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northern Cyclones NCDC 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0453 0.0482 0.0893 0.0950
2024-25 Northern Cyclones NCDC 45 13 16 29 0.644 0.2627 0.2677 0.5180 0.5278
2025-26 Northern Cyclones NCDC 25 9 16 25 1.000 0.4077 0.3935 0.8038 0.7758
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5324
Forward overall
#149
Forward born in 2005
#81
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Kane
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Cuce
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.