← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dima Zhilkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-10-21 Country: Canada
Top 13 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Toronto Patriots OJHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1226 0.1457 0.3442 0.4090
2024-25 Saginaw Spirit OHL 54 16 27 43 0.796 0.4607 0.5170 2.0850 2.3398
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 59 36 39 75 1.271 0.7354 0.7882 3.3285 3.5677
2026-27 Saginaw Spirit OHL 6 7 5 12 2.000 1.1570 1.1570 5.2368 5.2368
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3810
Forward overall
#13
Forward born in 2008

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.