IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Zurawski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-06 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 — OHL 61 16 15 31 0.508 0.3033 0.3296 1.3163 1.4306
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 63 24 22 46 0.730 0.4358 0.4517 1.8914 1.9605
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6104
Forward overall
#87
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Maddox Fleming
USHL 2021-22
0.34
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Max Ellis
USHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Brennan Ali
NTDP-U18 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Grant Silianoff
USHL 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.