← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Zurawski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-06 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 6, Pick #181  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Owen Sound Attack OHL 61 16 15 31 0.508 0.2940 0.3195 1.3307 1.4463
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 63 24 22 46 0.730 0.4224 0.4378 1.9120 1.9819
2026-27 Owen Sound Attack OHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.2893 0.2893 1.3092 1.3092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11055
Forward overall
#146
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.29
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2017-18
0.16
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2000-01
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.