IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Silver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-12-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Elite 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0155 0.0166 0.0202 0.0216
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Elite 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.0306 0.0312 0.0398 0.0406
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2024-25 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2023-24 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2022-23 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2021-22 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2020-21 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30471
Defenseman overall
#4404
Defenseman born in 2006
#1989
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braeden Young
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Girard
SUNY Cortland · 2025-26
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.