IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braeden Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-12-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 41 4 3 7 0.171 0.0520 0.0555 0.1265 0.1351
2019-20 Dauphin Kings MJHL 57 3 5 8 0.140 0.0382 0.0382 0.0885 0.0885
2020-21 Dauphin Kings MJHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.0906 0.0906 0.2100 0.2100
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 22 0 2 2 0.091
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 22 3 2 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2021-22 · Salve Regina
+378.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#58675
Forward overall
#3683
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bradley Tierney
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Shapiro
Connecticut College · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Nilsson
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.