IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dean Derouchie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Rockland Nationals CCHL 29 5 3 8 0.276 0.0598 0.0685 0.2135 0.2445
2013-14 — CCHL 56 13 13 26 0.464 0.1007 0.1103 0.3592 0.3935
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 45 6 10 16 0.356 0.0771 0.0809 0.2751 0.2886
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 12 28 40 0.667 0.1446 0.1447 0.5158 0.5163
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 20 17 37 0.673 0.1459 0.1384 0.5205 0.4936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#29790
Forward overall
#1238
Forward born in 1996
#648
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Troy Andrews
New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Dawes
Utica · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer DeRidder
Salem State · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.