IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Kapageridis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-08 Country: Canada
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 1 1 2 3 3.000 0.7353 0.8201 2.0655 2.3036
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1157 0.1214 0.5139 0.5393
2025-26 North Bay Battalion OHL 55 2 16 18 0.327 0.1893 0.1891 0.8410 0.8402
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6206
Defenseman overall
#866
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Malinski
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Duncan Ramsay
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.04
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Christian Evers
USHL 2015-16
0.31
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Conner Hutchison
BCHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Bartfield
Skidmore · 2020-21
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Bottem
Marian · 2020-21
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Barkley
Neumann · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.