← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andre Mondoux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-16 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 6, Pick #162  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pickering Panthers OJHL 54 3 11 14 0.259 0.0636 0.0705 0.1785 0.1978
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0753 0.3273 0.3411
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 66 6 12 18 0.273 0.1578 0.1565 0.7140 0.7082
2026-27 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 8 3 2 5 0.625 0.3616 0.3616 1.6365 1.6365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15144
Defenseman overall
#1998
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
BCHL 2024-25
0.08
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2019-20
0.05
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
BCHL 2017-18
0.09
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.