IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andre Mondoux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-16 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 6, Pick #162  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pickering Panthers OJHL 54 3 11 14 0.259 0.0636 0.0705 0.1785 0.1978
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0753 0.3212 0.3347
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 66 6 12 18 0.273 0.1578 0.1565 0.7007 0.6950
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14946
Defenseman overall
#1938
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Henry Nelson
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Tory Dello
USHL 2015-16
0.31
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Luke Ripley
BCHL 2012-13
0.19
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Hunter Weiss
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Ricky Helmbrecht
Curry · 2003-04
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Janis Zemitis
Elmira · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Massa
Nichols · 2022-23
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.