← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-08 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 5, Pick #133  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 53 3 31 34 0.641 0.1572 0.1725
2025-26 Windsor Spitfires OHL 63 9 15 24 0.381 0.2204 0.2276 0.9790 1.0109
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6345
Defenseman overall
#412
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2021-22
0.17
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2020-21
0.39
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2018-19
0.18
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.