IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Hannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Boston Dukes EHL 37 7 31 38 1.027 0.2372 0.2419 0.5025 0.5125
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 32 6 20 26 0.812
2024-25 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 32 6 20 26 0.812
2023-24 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 32 6 20 26 0.812
2022-23 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 32 6 20 26 0.812
2021-22 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 32 6 20 26 0.812
2020-21 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 32 6 20 26 0.812

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2291
Defenseman overall
#501
Defenseman born in 2004
#133
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincenzo Renda
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Fryfogle
Canton · 2022-23
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Martin Kapoian
Elmira · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.