IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Martin Kapoian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 41 14 21 35 0.854 0.1250 0.1329 0.4181 0.4444
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 43 28 22 50 1.163 0.1702 0.1715 0.5695 0.5737
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 14 1 4 5 0.357
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 24 7 6 13 0.542
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 27 7 5 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2018-19 · Elmira
+232.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11130
Forward overall
#498
Forward born in 1998
#128
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Boelter
Lawrence · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Stevens
Southern Maine · 2004-05
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.