IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Boelter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 14 30 44 0.733 0.2093 0.2024 0.5676 0.5490
2010-11 — NAHL 50 1 11 12 0.240 0.0891 0.0841 0.2541 0.2398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 26 4 12 16 0.615
2014-15 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2013-14 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 25 1 14 15 0.600
2012-13 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 27 6 15 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2012-13 · Lawrence
+526.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8060
Defenseman overall
#1213
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Roitman
Concordia · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Landon Cole
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ari Lifschutz
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.