← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richard Hart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 47 9 20 29 0.617 0.0774 0.0803 0.1948 0.2021
2017-18 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 47 8 23 31 0.660 0.0828 0.0817 0.2082 0.2054
2018-19 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 46 18 28 46 1.000 0.1255 0.1172 0.3157 0.2948
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 21 1 4 5 0.238
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 24 0 3 3 0.125
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 2 4 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · SUNY Morrisville
+146.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7788
Defenseman overall
#1523
Defenseman born in 1998
#1109
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2014-15
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2016-17
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.