IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Lang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 55 7 14 21 0.382 0.1403 0.1469 0.4030 0.4219
2013-14 — USHL 29 0 6 6 0.207 0.1221 0.1174 0.6214 0.5974
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 51 9 20 29 0.569 0.2089 0.1973 0.6002 0.5668
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 27 4 9 13 0.481
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 24 6 4 10 0.417
2016-17 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2015-16 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 25 7 6 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2015-16 · Saint John's
+233.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8235
Defenseman overall
#1215
Defenseman born in 1994
#2964
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Ripple
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kit Sitterley
UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Van Dyk
Castleton · 2010-11
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.