IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kit Sitterley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — NAHL 25 4 1 5 0.200 0.0743 0.0780 — —
2010-11 Langley Rivermen BCHL 42 11 5 16 0.381 0.1483 0.1463 0.5556 0.5482
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 60 12 21 33 0.550 0.2141 0.1995 0.8021 0.7474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 22 10 8 18 0.818
2013-14 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 27 8 12 20 0.741
2012-13 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 27 9 19 28 1.037
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2012-13 · UMass Boston
+579.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25782
Forward overall
#999
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Ratzloff
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.