IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harveer Kamboj Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Jersey Bears EHL 26 2 4 6 0.231 0.0533 0.0572 0.1129 0.1211
2024-25 New Jersey Bears EHL 34 7 9 16 0.471 0.1087 0.1110 0.2303 0.2352
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 — — 21 2 5 7 0.333
2024-25 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 — — 21 2 5 7 0.333
2023-24 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 — — 21 2 5 7 0.333
2022-23 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 — — 21 2 5 7 0.333
2021-22 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 — — 21 2 5 7 0.333
2020-21 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 — — 21 2 5 7 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12998
Defenseman overall
#2589
Defenseman born in 2005
#1644
in EHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Vocino
Canton · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Phillips
Rivier · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Kreuser
Concordia · 2016-17
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.