| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | New Ulm Steel | NA3HL | 45 | 20 | 34 | 54 | 1.200 | 0.1446 | 0.1504 | 0.3791 | 0.3944 |
| 2016-17 | New Ulm Steel | NA3HL | 41 | 19 | 26 | 45 | 1.098 | 0.1323 | 0.1310 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | New Ulm Steel | NA3HL | 44 | 9 | 34 | 43 | 0.977 | 0.1178 | 0.1106 | 0.3087 | 0.2899 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | SR | 13 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.615 |
| 2021-22 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | NCHA | SR | 13 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.615 |
| 2020-21 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | JR | 18 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.278 |
| 2020-21 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | JR | 18 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.278 |
| 2019-20 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | SO | 23 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.957 |
| 2019-20 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | SO | 23 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.957 |
| 2018-19 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | FR | 14 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.214 |
| 2018-19 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | FR | 14 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.214 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.