IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danil Kalashnikov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 38 3 2 5 0.132 0.0337 0.0355 0.0992 0.1044
2010-11 Neepawa Titans MJHL 56 21 16 37 0.661 0.1272 0.1269 0.4166 0.4156
2011-12 — MJHL 47 16 21 37 0.787 0.1515 0.1435 0.4964 0.4703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC — 19 1 6 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2012-13 · Concordia
+214.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34488
Forward overall
#1196
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finn Theriault
Nazareth · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Hellems
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aiden Lindley
Stevenson · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.