← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Lindley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 16 4 9 13 0.812 0.0916 0.0916 0.2764 0.2764
2021-22 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 33 6 21 27 0.818 0.1578 0.1578 0.3744 0.3744
2022-23 South Shore Kings NCDC 48 10 9 19 0.396 0.0915 0.0932 0.3200 0.3258
2023-24 South Shore Kings NCDC 51 15 27 42 0.824 0.1903 0.1830 0.6659 0.6402
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 22 3 5 8 0.364
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC 28 7 9 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2024-25 · Stevenson
+353.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12972
Forward overall
#614
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.