IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Lindley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 16 4 9 13 0.812 0.1063 0.1063 0.2758 0.2758
2021-22 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 33 6 21 27 0.818 0.1621 0.1621 0.3728 0.3728
2022-23 South Shore Kings NCDC 48 10 9 19 0.396 0.1614 0.1643 0.3181 0.3239
2023-24 South Shore Kings NCDC 51 15 27 42 0.824 0.3357 0.3228 0.6619 0.6364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 22 3 5 8 0.364
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC — 28 7 9 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2024-25 · Stevenson
+157.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11534
Forward overall
#518
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Altenbernd
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua German
Arcadia · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Stallard
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.