IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Vocino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 50 20 27 47 0.940 0.2304 0.2243 0.6472 0.6301
2014-15 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 45 9 24 33 0.733 0.1797 0.1657 0.5049 0.4654
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 24 6 8 14 0.583
2016-17 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 25 8 10 18 0.720
2015-16 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 24 5 1 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2015-16 · Canton
+54.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22030
Forward overall
#854
Forward born in 1994
#925
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Mead
Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Roberts
Utica · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Nielsen
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.