← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Chitaroni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 60 10 14 24 0.400 0.2314 0.2511 1.0278 1.1155
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23723
Forward overall
#95
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2008-09
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.