IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Diamantoni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.1062 0.1152 0.4995 0.5418
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 53 8 24 32 0.604 0.2242 0.2399 2.9967 3.0907
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 58 12 38 50 0.862 0.3355 0.3386 1.2572 1.2689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 42 6 18 24 0.571
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 36 6 14 20 0.556
2015-16 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 38 4 7 11 0.289
2014-15 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 34 1 8 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2014-15 · Northern Michigan
+3.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11255
Forward overall
#397
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Faust
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Ruffin
Adrian · 2017-18
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2007-08
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Arias
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.