IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Roscoe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-03-05 Country: USA
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 30 2 1 3 0.100 0.0579 0.0631 0.2570 0.2802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24572
Defenseman overall
#306
Defenseman born in 2009
#1692
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Linhart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Collins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Griffin Luce
USHL 2014-15
0.11
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Chase Pietila
USHL 2020-21
0.55
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Maxim Strbak
SM-Liiga-Jr 2021-22
0.28
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Drew Schock
USHL 2023-24
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2008-09
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Boyd
Adrian · 2011-12
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Murphy
Westfield State · 2006-07
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.