IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Kelley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Evansville Jr. Thunderbolts NA3HL 42 11 19 30 0.714 0.0896 0.0990 0.2255 0.2492
2016-17 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Elite 20 9 8 17 0.850 0.0785 0.0830 0.1946 0.2057
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 21 0 3 3 0.143 0.0330 0.0339 0.0699 0.0718
2018-19 Seahawks Hockey EHL 28 2 1 3 0.107 0.0247 0.0241 0.0524 0.0512
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54115
Forward overall
#3008
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Jones
Salve Regina · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner DuFault
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan O'Malley
Castleton · 2013-14
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.