IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan O'Malley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 44 6 20 26 0.591 0.0865 0.0837 0.2894 0.2802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2016-17 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 18 0 2 2 0.111
2014-15 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2014-15 · Castleton
5.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6373
Defenseman overall
#930
Defenseman born in 1993
#768
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Knoepke
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Serdachny
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hughes
Lawrence · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.