IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner DuFault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 51 2 8 10 0.196 0.0720 0.0733 0.2070 0.2107
2016-17 — NAHL 30 5 7 12 0.400 0.1470 0.1417 0.4222 0.4069
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 10 3 4 7 0.700
2019-20 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 20 4 3 7 0.350
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 15 4 2 6 0.400
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · Saint John's
+27.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41238
Forward overall
#1817
Forward born in 1996
#4424
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Grogan
St. Olaf · 2007-08
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Artur Kondrashov
Lebanon Valley · 2024-25
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Otto
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.