IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Jacobs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 48 2 13 15 0.312 0.1990 0.2163 0.9365 1.0179
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 56 5 18 23 0.411 0.2615 0.2720 1.2307 1.2802
2015-16 Sarnia Sting OHL 67 4 20 24 0.358 0.2138 0.2002 0.9278 0.8689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 35 0 9 9 0.257
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2014-15 · Michigan State
+9.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3148
Defenseman overall
#705
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Geoff Fortman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Canisius (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hinz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Alaska
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chance Gorman
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory McWilliams
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.