IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-01-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Wenatchee Wild WHL 68 11 42 53 0.779 0.3792 0.3732 1.9068 1.8766
2001-02 — WHL 67 17 37 54 0.806 0.3921 0.3668 1.9719 1.8445
2002-03 — WHL 66 17 29 46 0.697 0.3391 0.3000 1.7052 1.5086
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 24 5 4 9 0.375
2008-09 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 24 4 9 13 0.542
2006-07 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 16 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2195
Defenseman overall
#375
Defenseman born in 1982
#417
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2002-03
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.