| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 55 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.364 | 0.2235 | 0.2142 | 1.0712 | 1.0266 |
| 2006-07 | Mahoning Valley Phantoms | NAHL | 52 | 42 | 41 | 83 | 1.596 | 0.6324 | 0.5848 | 1.6759 | 1.5497 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Bentley | D1 | — | SR | 33 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 0.727 |
| 2009-10 | Bentley | D1 | — | JR | 15 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.733 |
| 2008-09 | Bentley | D1 | — | SO | 38 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 0.895 |
| 2007-08 | Bentley | D1 | — | FR | 35 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 0.686 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.